Wednesday, November 26, 2014

1492 is a lie.

Christopher Columbus? Bah Humbug!

Reading this huge thesis is mind blowing:

http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/bitstream/10150/291536/1/azu_td_1340264_sip1_m.pdf

Here is a quick intro:

If a bias exists, it will have to weather an imminent battle likely to occur in the near future. The last twenty years have produced a veritable avalanche of new material which is certain to enter the realm of public awareness as we approach the quincentennial of Columbus’ “discovery.” The possibility that mainstream scientists will take a more objective view of this topic remains to be seen. However, regardless of one’s beliefs or loyalties, the evidence should be judged on its own merits. After all, what could be so extraordinary in appearance, substance, and form that its very existence challenges many of the deep-seated beliefs held by science regarding American pre-history. One could argue that if pieces don’t fit the puzzle, they should be investigated rather than ignored as has been the routine in the past 100 years.

Very interesting read

No comments:

Post a Comment